The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Monday, August 31, 2009
<< How Easy Is It To Manipulate a Breathalyzer? Welcome to the Family Logan >>
Politicians Aren't Public Servants

To date, I really haven't commented on the death of Ted Kennedy.  Now that he has been buried, its a little bit easier to examine what people are saying about him, and reflect on who he was.  What bothers me in general about the commentary regarding Kennedy's death are the references to how we need to thank him for his "sacrifice" and "public service".  In fact, this is a common phrase that is echoed whenever someone who has spent a great deal of time in politics has died... and is even used when a major political figure simply retires to private life.  Their "public service" must be honored and praised.

Politicians, no matter which side of the aisle they sit on, deserve no honor for "public service".  They are elected, and compensated, for doing a job.  They rarely, if ever, "sacrifice" themselves in that job.  In fact, they are compensated far too much, and take from the public for their own individual needs far too much.  All politicians do this, Ted Kennedy among them.  They also create rules for themselves which other people who are not members of the ruling class do not enjoy.  They receive benefits for what they do that are far more lavish than the average person, and make sure that the rules are written in such a way that it is difficult to get them out of politics until they choose to leave.

He became Senator, not because of any specific sacrifice on his part, but because he had a rich and privileged father, and two brothers who had made waves in politics before him.  And while in office, he never sacrificed of himself.  Politicians never do.  Favor is curried to them by anyone who wants a bill passed, and they take from those people whatever they want for their own personal enjoyment.  Whether it's killing off a wind farm because it will obstruct your vacation home's view, or avoiding scrutiny in the death of a woman.  He had power, and he used it.  He enriched himself at the expense of all of us... and took from us not only money, but freedom.

Exhalting politicians for their "sacrifice in public service" is an insult to real public servants who truly do give of themselves or the benefit of others.  Those who serve in the military, firemen, and those police officers who choose not to allow themselves to be corrupted, truly sacrifice themselves for the greater public good.  Not only should what they do be held up more as an example, but we should not diminish the term "sacrifice" by claiming others do it when they clearly do not.

# Posted at 1:33 PM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 4 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Current Events

Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:47:08 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Excellent.
Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:08:37 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Totally agree with above. This man was *not* a great person, though his sister, who passed on a week or two before him, was. Was not in the States when he died; was sickened by the hagiographia offered up by the EU I was directly exposed to at the time.
Sunday, September 06, 2009 12:37:20 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Wow this is some special kind of cynical you got going there. I take exception to painting Teddy Kennedy with the giant anti government brush you swing with such elacrity. I think the hole in our theory is that if it is not sacrifice for a rich, powerful and well connected man to dedicate his political career to serving the disenfranchised then what is it? Your telling me that if you were a multi millionare with a famous name you would spend your days meeting with the "little people"? Really? So Ted Kennedy is just like a fat male Paris Hilton? Over his life he pushed forward programs that have helped thousands if not millions of people who would otherwise gone without. Causes for women and children and people of low means. Over the last couple of weeks average person and world leader including his political nemesises have come forward to honor a man that even if they hated everyting he stood for they still respected or even loved the man. That doesn't sound like the power mad sychophants you are describing. I guess your argument would also hold true for our founding fathers and their self serving Constitution and Teddy Roosevelt and Lincoln and every other person who has held office for they were all politicians. Even those who have paid with their lives. If all of that is true to you then I guess your supposition holds in your world but otherwise its just a liberatrian fart in the wind.
Shannon
Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:31:35 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Excellent post, Nick.

Shannon said:

Your telling me that if you were a multi millionaire with a famous name you would spend your days meeting with the "little people"?

That statement embodies everything about government-lovers that makes the rest of us crazy.

In one breath, you're sure to tell us how noble the late Ted Kennedy was for turning away a life of leisure and luxury to help the "disenfranchised", and then in the next wonder how on earth any rich and famous person could hang out with the "little people".

So what you're saying is that Ted Kennedy couldn't possibly hang out with the disenfranchised, but "serving" them (as you put it) with other people's money somehow made him noble. Here you have a man who had all of the wealth and fame anyone could have wanted. But instead of using his own money and dedicating his life to living amongst the "little people" and making deeply personal connections with them as he helped them, he instead chose to get paid by taxpayers only to give away their money to the "little people", just to make himself look "noble".

I have news for you, Shannon: That isn't being a "servant". Giving away other people's money to help the poor simply because you have the power to do so does not qualify as humble servitude. Servitude involves sacrifice, and there isn't anything noble or sacrificial about stealing fifty dollars from my wallet and giving it to someone who Ted Kennedy deems is more worthy of it than I am.

These elected thieves aren't servants and they certainly aren't noble. If your definition of noble is getting paid to give away the fruits of someone's labor (by the end of a gun), then I guess we're going to just have to agree to disagree.



Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2012 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar