The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, October 16, 2008
<< King George Still No Difference Between Obama and McCain >>
Debate III ... or a Stranger in a Strange Land

For the previous debates, I'd tried different tactics.  I simply summarized the next day, I twittered, I live/drunk blogged... but this time I thought it might be interesting to watch the debate with a group of people.  As it turns out, Drinking Liberally was last night, and they had a room setup at Sugar Maple with a television where everyone could watch the debate.  I've been to Drinking Liberally before, and in general it is always a nice time.  No matter how much we disagree (sometimes angrily) online, the atmosphere was always welcoming in person.  As it turns out, I should have known better, and had I to do all over again, I would have simply drunk blogged it from home.  But more on that later.  First... the actual debate.

I should preface all this by saying that I missed certain portions when I stepped out to get more Scotch Ale, and that I didn't watch the last 15 minutes or so because I was just sick and tired of the whole mess.  So this is coming off a comination of my recollections of the night, and the transcipt of the debate.  I really didn't like this format at all.  Because of the extended "discussion time" allowed, the candidates ended up chasing their tails and repeating things a lot.  There was very little value in having this extra time to talk about things because each candidate seems unable to do anything be re-deliver talking points, despite Schieffer's pleading with them.

Who's Tax Plan is Better

McCain - "They're innocent victims of greed and excess on Wall Street and as well as Washington, D.C."  Look... I understand that its generally not a good idea as a politician to tell the voters that its their own damned fault... but voters are culpable in this mess too... and we know it.  There are a whole slew of people out there who would actually vote for the guy if he would talk about people buying houses that they knew they couldn't afford.  Then he talks about his horrible, horrible, mortgage plan.  He wrongly states that if we don't do this, people won't make their mortgage.  Look... you may not like that you're paying a $500,000 mortgage on a house thats worth only $250,000... but unless you were doing a risky ARM, that doesn't change your mortgage payment.  It sucks, but the monthly bill is the same.

Obama - "I think everybody understands at this point that we are experiencing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression."  Way to introduce confidence in the markets Barack.  And your statement is only true if we continue to enact overbearing government solutions to the problem.  Then he mentions his horrible, horrible "job creation" program.  *sigh*

Joe the PlumberTM

This is probably what got me drunkest last night.  Every time they mentioned Joe the Plumber, I had to take a drink.  Here is the video that everybody was referring to:

The problem is that most undecided voters probably never heard of Joe the Plumber before last night, and McCain talked as if everyone did.  What I realized is that most of his debate answers were assuming an audience of insiders, who are following the election closely.  That is incredibly stupid, because they've already made up their mind.  In that sense, overall Obama did a better job last night because he did a better job of explaining his policies to someone who hasn't been keeping up with all the tiny battles.  McCain needed to talk to the audience of undecided voters, who haven't been following the election closely.

Obama's strongest response regarding Joe was this line: "Five years ago, when you were in a position to buy your business, you needed a tax cut then."  It's the perfect liberal line... and is also the most angering one in that whole debate segment.  The point of the Joe the PlumberTM story is that he got to where he was without help 5 years ago.  Obama is telling him he needed help, and Joe was telling him that he did fine with just hard work, and now didn't want to be punished for it, just to make it easier for someone else at his expense.

Joe could have been a good hit during the debate, but McCain kept coming back to it, and so it made him seem desperate, like he didn't have anything else to hit Obama on.  Every time he mentioned Joe the Plumber, it made him look weaker.  And what is it with "Joe's" anyway?  Joe Six PackTM, Joe The PlumberTM, Joe McCain (John's younger brother), Joe Average AmericanTM... they're everywhere!

On Taxes

McCain - "The fact is that businesses in America today are paying the second highest tax rate of anywhere in the world. Our tax rate for business in America is 35 percent. Ireland, it's 11 percent. Where are companies going to go where they can create jobs and where they can do best in business?"  I wish McCain had hit this harder and more often.  This was one of the best things he said all night.

On Spending

Once again, Scheiffer did what every other moderator has done, and tried to get either candidate to mention something, anything, they wouldn't spend money on.  Once again, both candidates are in la la land.

Obama - "Well, first of all, I think it's important for the American public to understand that the $750 billion rescue package, if it's structured properly, and, as president, I will make sure it's structured properly, means that ultimately taxpayers get their money back, and that's important to understand."  This is the same government that helped to create this problem, and that has never in it's history properly structured anything.  Why on Earth should anyone think that you can all of a sudden do it right?  Seriously.  How stupid do you think we are?

McCain - He immediately goes to the tired old rag of energy independence.  As Megan McArdle commented:

McCain tries to draw a distinction between good foreign oil from Canada, and bad foreign oil from Venezuela.  Can someone sit down with him and explain, using small words and charts, the meaning of the words "global market" and "fungible commodity"?
...
Not to be outdone, Barack Obama claims that he, too, thinks we can get off that nasty Venezuelan oil in 8-10 years.  All right, let's get down to brass tacks:  which one of these two candidates has more pull with the Fairy King?  Because that's where you get the really cool sustainable technology.  You never see fairies using fossil fuels, do you?  No you don't.

Neither candidate understands global markets.  McCain then brings up earmarks again and his "across the board spending freeze" which doesn't include the military, veterans benefits, Social Security, Medicare... in other words... it doesn't include 90+% of the budget.  How brave.

Obama - He calls McCain out on the reality of pork, but then claims he'll be more responsible, when he has no history of being able to do so.  Are you seriously trying to claim that as a Democrat you'd cut spending?

Best Lines of the Night

Both candidates had their best one liners in a short period of time here.

McCain - "Senator Obama, I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago. I'm going to give a new direction to this economy in this country."

Obama - "Now with respect to a couple of things Senator McCain said, the notion that I voted for a tax increase for people making $42,000 a year has been disputed by everybody who has looked at this claim that Senator McCain keeps on making. Even FOX News disputes it, and that doesn't happen very often when it comes to accusations about me."

On Balancing the Budget

McCain tries to claim he can do it in four years.  Obama repeats his tired line of going over the budget line by line.  The way McCain asserts himself in these situations really gets me.  He never says how, he simply asserts "I can do it my friends, I know how".  It reminds me of this scene from Office Space:

"I have leadership skills!  Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?"  I'm kept waiting for McCain to talk about his Jump to Conclusions mat.

On the Negative Campaigning

This was simply a stupid topic to talk about.  McCain sounded hurt, but not very convincingly... and the reality is... both parties are at fault here.  Both parties throw mud and pretend they don't, and act hurt by the mud the other side throws.  Welcome to American Politics.  McCain did do a good job hitting Obama on his broken promise to take federal funds, but thats about all that was good here.

This is also where Drinking Liberally turned a little nasty and I had to step out for a few minutes before I lost control.  I said something to someone next to me regarding how both sides are being nasty, and he brought up some of the McCain attacks, and seemed to think Obama supporters were clean.  I said that "Nobody is clean here.  Look at the people who are calling Sarah Palin a cunt".  He then looked me straight in the face (with his girlfriend right next to him) and said "But Sarah Palin is a cunt."  I almost lost it right there.  I simply responded with "Then you are no better than anyone else", and walked out for a few minutes.

Who's Vice President Would Make a Better President

Scheiffer - Please take the next 5 minutes to gush about your Vice President, because I'm need to take a breather.

On Health Care

Obama - If you like your current plan, you can keep it.  All we're going to do is make it cheaper, and make health care cheaper.  How?!  He never really says.  Some how, by forcing companies to insure people with pre-existing conditions (which increases costs), and subsidizing more medication (also increases costs), we'll lower the cost.  Obama's math skills seem deficient here.

McCain - We need to put medical records online.  That's probably the most idiotic idea I've ever heard.  How many times a week do you hear about government databases being broken into and criminals getting information for identity theft?  How often do you hear about online stores having credit card numbers stolen?  And you want to put my medical information online too?  Fuck that.

On Abortion

Nobody wants to admit a litmus test, but everyone has one.  Next question.  On the "infanticide in Illinois" issue... like abortion itself, it doesn't sway anyone sadly.  If you're pro-life, you like to hear about this, and if you're pro-choice, you believe Obama's response.

On Education

Obama - More money for college!  Have you ever noticed that every time the government gives more money to people to go to college, the cost of tuition goes up a corresponding amount?  So more government money for college doesn't solve the problem, if there was one in the first place.  Not everyone needs to go to college.  I honestly don't think that having more people with degrees in "Women's Studies" or some of the other liberal arts degrees, actually gives them much value when they try to go to the work force.

McCain - Dude, why can't you say "I'll abolish the Dept. of Education and put control of your child's education back in you, the parent's hands?"  It's just that simple.  The Federal government has no Constitutional mandate to do anything about education.  Instead, all it can do is blackmail states into doing things by withholding funds.

Afterwards

As I said, I missed the last 15 minutes of the debate, and when it was over, I spent a little while talking with some of Ally's friends who happened to be there.  When they left, I made the mistake of going back in and chatting with some other people after the debate.  I ended up talking with a rather beligerent postal worker who poked me several times while making his point, and actually shoved me a little.  I held my ground, and somehow remained respectful, while still firmly making my points.  He actually complained during the exchange that I was trying to win the argument by being polite.  I was then put in the awkward position of apoligizing to a person for being polite to him.  How silly of me.

During the exchange where he berated me for being a libertarian, and tried to talk about how markets were evil, how computer software is ruining the world, someone else threw a coaster at me.  They're cardboard, so its not like I was hurt physically.  But it made the point that at a certain point, people would rather not talk, and would rather intimidate, or take the easy route and resort to childish stunts.  Alcohol never helps either of course.  Thankfully, the liberal bloggers I know weren't involved... these were just liberals hanging out watching the debate.  Thankfully I then had the opportunity to talk to one of the Drinking Liberally regulars who is a law student at Marquette.  It was a good conversation, and luckily salvaged the evening... but I still don't think I'll be heading back there for a while.

# Posted at 8:56 AM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 9 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Politics

Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:37:22 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
So, have you finally learned your lesson?
Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:55:09 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
At what point might you consider that your problem isn't so much about "Drinking Right" or "Drinking Left", but just "drinking"? Isn't it the whole point that drinking alters one's behavior and perceptions? So you're surprised that one side or the other, after having their inhibitions lowered by sweet booze, begins to show the less civilized edge of their personalities? Again, isn't that a major factor in any partisan gathering - that they like the opportunity to speak freely among peers they believe might enjoy things they wouldn't say in other mixed company? Surely you're not suggesting that you haven't heard things uttered at Drinking Right that make you cringe.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:16:20 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Acutally John, I can honestly say that I haven't heard something uttered at Drinking Right that made me cringe. I've also never been shoved, and never had anything thrown at me. And believe me, it's not that any less drinking occurs.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:55:14 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Of course, at Smoking Libertarian, everyone's pretty mellow.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:17:13 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
John, I've attended both Drinking Liberally and Drinking Right (hell, I'm one of the people that founded the thing!), and I can honestly say there is a difference. For all the talk on blogs about how mean and evil people on right are, I've found many of those who attend Drinking Right to be extremely cordial, soft spoken (save for a few, who know who they are!) and willing to belly up to the bar with anyone that attends...and I mean ANYONE. I myself have extended invitations to countless left-wingers, and not a single one has ever shown up. That could have changed, though, since it's been some time since I've been able to attend myself.

Meanwhile, while I've never had quite the experience Nick seems to have had at Drinking Liberally, I will say that the reception a right-winger gets when they walk in the door can generally be described as "cold." Sure, there are people there who were welcoming when I walked in because they knew of me from blogging (which I think reinforces what Nick said about how the bloggers acted), but many of the people in attendance would be described as anything but welcoming. The first thing out of their mouths upon hearing I'm a conservative is scorn and criticism, accompanied by a look I can only imagine might be given to an creature from another planet (I'm not that ugly). And in the end, it really doesn't present itself as an environment where anyone is willing to hear or discuss anything they don't already agree with.

Trust me, that IS NOT the case at Drinking Right. Attend sometime and you'll find out.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:53:24 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
I attended one DL this summer. Frankly, it seemed pretty tame. No cringe-worthy moments stick in my memory. At the one I attended, I was disappointed that none of the big famous liberal bloggers attended. I have a vague memory of some guy there who advertised himself as a libertarian, and that I cocked my ear at the conversation and it wasn't exciting enough to even get engaged in it.

I've considered attending a DR, too. I know everyone would like to meet Mr. Boots and Kittens. I welcome opportunities for more groupies.

Attending either is a chore for me due to the distance (I'm in the hinterlands of Jefferson County) and the nights I spend with my kids.

When I first heard of DL and DR, I discussed starting one out here with a friend of mine. I aligned with his wise take on it: that it would be more interesting if we called it simply Drinking Politically, invite everyone, and not try to turn it into a partisan event. We considered not holding it in a bar as to deemphasize the alcohol side of it - as Haas has since done with Eating Liberally.

To put this in perspective, this friend of mine has since become the head of the county Democrats. As you both imply, I think it's perfectly possible to imagine a diverse group getting together and having a good time. It would be a good contrast to the usual demonstrations of the Greater Internet F*ckwad Theory that you see in, say, the RDW comment section.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:14:32 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
I hope it wasn't my wife throwing things at you. She gets pretty ornery around anyone that disagrees with her. Believe me, I know.
buzz
Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:16:14 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
re, the nasty ads:

There is a difference.

Obama attacks McCain's POLICIES.

McCAIN attacks Obama as a human being.

It's not a moral equivalence.
Saturday, October 18, 2008 12:50:45 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
I'm sorry to hear about the obvious boor and hope you don't hold it against the rest of us.

David,

As for DR, I know I would get a long well enough with Nick (I've already talked to him a few times and he hasn't killed me yet), you and most of the righties. However, if you were to be completely honest, there are some, and I'll respect Nick's place and not name names, that I doubt would be anywhere near civil to me.

Tis the nature of the beast, unfortunately, for too many people.

Perhaps someone should invent a Drinking Neutrally.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2010 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar