The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Wednesday, August 06, 2008
<< Please Choose Exactly One Random Thought >>
Troubling Milwaukee SWAT Raid

If the claims in this lawsuit prove to be true, this is an extremely troubling misuse of paramilitary police forces in Milwaukee.  Apparently the timeline unfolded along these lines.  Approximately 9 days before a no-knock raid was executed against a Franklin house, the sister of the homeowner alleged that her son (the home owner's nephew) was threatened by the homeowner and had illegal weapons.  The Milwaukee Police, without consulting Franklin police, nor interviewing the nephew, got a no-knock warrant for the house.  The husband, apparently thinking his house was being robbed, got a handgun and called out to find out who was there, and was shot by the police.  After the arrest, they were then detained without counsel, and the woman, who has a heart condition, was denied medical treatment.

What get's me here is the 9 days between the threat and the SWAT raid.  If this couple was found to be so dangerous as to require the use of a SWAT team and a no-knock warrant, why on Earth would they wait nine days?  And more importantly, why did they never contact the Franklin police or interview the nephew during this time?  The Franklin police could have verified whether the couple had previous issues in the community which the sister alleged, and surely you'd want to verify the validity of the threats with the boy before embarking on an incredibly dangerous paramilitary operation... wouldn't you?

# Posted at 12:58 PM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 3 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Overkill

Thursday, August 07, 2008 7:55:21 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
A couple of thoughts. First, you've got one side of the story from a JS reporter. I don't see all the facts. Particularly any real input from the police side of this.

Second, the 9 days doesn't seem like much of an issue to me. It was a low priority raid and it likely had to clear authorization, or other jobs ahead of it. You'd rather they just went in right away? What difference would that have made? If it was wrong, it was wrong no matter when the raid occurred.

Plus, "extremely troubling misuse" is a bit of a jump for me. A misuse would be something done improperly. That doesn't appear to be the case here. Wrongly, yes. To an extreme? Perhaps. Improperly? Seems like they followed protocol.

Mostly, though, I think you're forming an opinion before knowing everything about the case.
Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:49:49 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
To your points Jimi... the 9 days is important because, at least in theory, the only reason for using a paramilitary raid in this type of case is supposed to be because there is an immediate danger presented by the person named in the warrant... in this case because of threats that were supposedly made. But how dangerous could they have been perceived to be, if they waited more than a week? That blows the justification for using a SWAT team at all out of the water on that fact alone.

It is extremely troubling because this is just another data point among thousands across this country where SWAT teams are used improperly, in cases where they are not justified. The Milwaukee police, at least according to this suit, didn't even check the validity of the claims that they had a police relationship with the local Franklin police. That would have been another justification for using a SWAT team instead of some other type of procedure.

You have to remember, that SWAT raids are extraordinarily dangerous, highly dynamic, with little or no room for error. Police, as well as home owners, are often times hurt or wounded (often unnecessarily) during these raids. Because of that high degree of danger, their use should be extremely limited, and the planning behind them should be EXTREME. Neither took place here.
Friday, August 08, 2008 12:03:55 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Again, there's the other side to this which we haven't heard completely. Also, in this day and age, SWAT teams are not immediate danger situations. You've got that waaaaaay wrong. There is often extensive investigation long before a SWAT team comes in. There are used for immediate danger situations. But, more often, they're used for high risk situations. Again, it's not uncommon to conduct a raid that's been in the works for some time.

Yes, according to the suit the police didn't check the claims. I don't know we know that to be absolutely true.

Lastly, SWAT teams work with information given them. While it's obviously true mistakes are made, I'd look higher up the chain of command for fault.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2012 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar