The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, July 24, 2008
<< Security Theater Continued Be Back Later >>
Normalizing Pedophilia

Here is an interesting take on the latest trend, where people are either outright banned from, or are scorned somehow for taking pictures of children in public places:

The assumption that pictures represent a significant threat to children has acquired a fantasy-like grotesque character. We rarely dare ask the question: what possible harm can come from taking pictures of children playing soccer? Dark hints about the threat of evil networks of pedophiles are sufficient to corrode common sense. Tragically, what the dramatization and criminalization of the act of photographing children reveals is a culture that regards virtually every childhood experience from the standpoint of a pedophile.

Every possible form of interaction between an adult and a child is perceived as yet another opportunity for child abuse. In a roundabout way society has normalized pedophilia. The default position is to always expect the worse — and therefore children should be placed in purdah.

Combine this with the crazy tactics being taken towards people who are found guilty of sex crimes, and you can see that our society is making it out as if everything has some evil sexual aspect to it.  It's actually incredibly sad.

A man sitting on a beach watching some kids play, because they might look a lot like his own who he hasn't seen in a few months, would probably be stared at by parents in the area thinking he's a pervert.  Of course, the way the media portrays it, by exposing every rare incident as if it were common doesn't help either.

More at Dr. Helen.

# Posted at 10:14 PM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 3 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Photography

Saturday, July 26, 2008 2:25:18 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Combine this with the crazy tactics being taken towards people who are found guilty of sex crimes, and you can see that our society is making it out as if everything has some evil sexual aspect to it.

I'm not sure I'm reading this right . . . or it you wrote it wrong. Incredulous, if true. What we're finding out is that we're scratching the surface of what is a pervasive problem. Crazy tactics? I call it protecting society. In fact, I think we're too light on sex offenders. Particularly, those who prey on children.

I took my camera to my daughter's school this past fall. While she was out at recess, I took pictures of the kids. One of the teachers, who knew me quite well, came up to me and told me to put the camera away . . . or, at least be discreet. I immediately understood. Not everyone knows me, and we're talking about someone else's children. I might not think much of a parent taking pictures of the kids at school, but other parents might not like it.

While I get your larger point, that particular statement is irresponsible.
Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:43:34 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
No it's not Jimi. When I say "sex offender"... I mean everyone who is classified as one, and has to go through hell just to find someplace to live. This includes the 18 year old guy who might have had sex with his 16 year old girlfriend, but is now consider a child sex offender, and can't live in half the cities in this country any more.
Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:20:01 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Pretty generalized statement, then. When someone says"found guilty of sex crimes", that's a pretty broad statement which certainly includes the real assbags of our society. Of which are likely the larger percentage of the two groups . . . those who are perverts and those who banged their underage girlfriend. But, I admit, I'm guessing. I would have worded it more carefully. As such, I stand by my statement.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2009 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar