The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, June 26, 2008
<< Supreme Court Dusts Off Constitution You're Here?! >>
It's Called Good Parenting Numb Nuts

The Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (there's a Federal agency for everything these days) has come out with a report that 650,000 people under the age of 21 (note that I don't call them children) were actually given alcohol by... get this... their parents.  Oh the horror!

More than 40 percent of the nation’s estimated 10.8 million underage current drinkers (persons aged 12 to 20 who drank in the past 30 days) were provided free alcohol by adults 21 or older, according to a nationwide report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.  The study also indicates that one in 16 underage drinkers (6.4 percent or 650,000) was given alcoholic beverages by their parents in the past month.

"In far too many instances parents directly enable their children's underage drinking – in essence encouraging them to risk their health and wellbeing," said Acting Surgeon General Steven K. Galson, M.D., M.P.H, a rear admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service. "Proper parental guidance alone may not be the complete solution to this devastating public health problem – but it is a critical part."

Interestingly enough, Dr. Galson get's it exactly right.  Proper parental guidance is a critical part.  Unfortunately, our society, and many laws, make proper parental guidance in the area of drinking almost impossible for a parent to give.

The assumption by the government (driven by the neo-prohibition madness of groups like MADD) is that any amount of alcohol served to someone under 21 is bad.  Talk about idiotic.  Just as in other areas of life, parents are invaluable in teaching children the proper roll of alcohol in social situations... essentially... we need more parents to teach their children how to drink.  That drinking is not the same as binging.  That having a glass of wine, or a couple of beers is perfectly acceptable... and more importantly... enough.

The problem is this attitude of depriving anyone under 21 of all contact with alcohol, so that when they finally do get a chance to drink, they tend to go overboard in unsupervised situations.  From personal experience (and I was having drinks before I was 13)... if you drink at an early age... by the time you get to college... it's no big deal.  In fact, I spent my 21st birthday in a lab instead of a bar.  Maybe that says more about me... but I can say that turning 21 didn't feel like a milestone to me, because I'd been drinking before that.

# Posted at 10:49 AM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 4 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Stupid Laws

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:59:47 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Yeah, and if you had kids and tried this like I have, it just gives them one more thing to complain about. "Dad, this fake Bailey's doesn't taste so great." "What's with the lousy beer around here?" "Whaddya mean, I have to order a virgin pina colada?" "No wonder you hide the aged tequila, it's much smoother and a little sweeter." "Dad, you put that lousy banana rum in our smoothies this time didn't you?" And my oldest is only thirteen.
Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:05:39 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
What is your answer for the parental units in which one, or both, are alcoholics. Are these the teachers you want for the children?
Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21:25 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
There will always be bad examples. That is not an excuse to take away the rights from the rest of the parents to teach their children. But having been friends with a few people who's parents were alcoholics... they taught their children a lesson. While there are many alcoholics who's parents were also, there are also plenty of people who were so damaged by alcoholic parents that they never want to touch the stuff.

But if you want examples of how this works... look to European countries. They have far more liberal drinking laws regarding age, and far fewer incidences of drunk driving, as well as fewer binge drinkers. We've just created a culture where social drinking is being driven more and more to the outside, which is never a good thing. The only way to correct that culture is to start with the children and families.
Friday, June 27, 2008 4:09:32 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
If I hadn't decided it's too hot to have a martini (or any other booze for that matter), I'd be raising a glass to you.

Your point about the neo-prohibition madness of MADD is an excellent one. I grew up with a relative who made wine before making wine at home was fashionable. My family did not drink, by which I mean that adults and older children had ONE glass of wine at dinner and otherwise weren't interested in alcohol. Wine was simply another food course and, like all food, needed to be consumed modestly.

Oddly enough if you were to talk to "substance abuse evaluators" in the judicial system (and I have several friends who do exactly that for a living) they're all trained to ask how often a person drinks. If you answer "nightly" -- and EVEN IF it's one glass of wine per night with dinner -- you're considered an alcoholic.

Know what? I bet Jesus -- yeah, the guy who wasn't happy enough with water so He changed it to wine -- might be a bit shocked at that.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2012 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar