The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Monday, February 04, 2008
<< Monday Music - 90's Edition If Gluttony Is Your Favorite Sin... >>
It Makes Me Feel All Dirty...

... and not in a good way, but I'm going to say this anyway.  I actually agree with Ann Coulter*shudder*  As always, I think Ann Coulter's methods are unfortunate, especially saying that he has no honor (which was uncalled for).  However, I think she makes a lot of good points.  I've said this before, and I'll say it again.  There is hardly any difference between Hillary Clinton and George Bush, and likewise, there is hardly any difference between Hillary and McCain.  There are many times that he has crossed the aisle to pass bills which no conservative worth his salt should have supported.  I also think there is some truth to the idea that Hillary is pulling left just to get the nomination, and that her actual record isn't quite as liberal as everyone paints.  Obama is much more liberal on most issues, its just that Hillary is willing to pander to the left right now, but does a poor job of it.  Likewise, McCain is pandering to the right despite his liberal record, but for reasons unknown to me, is more successful at it.

But in the end, people's hatred of Hillary, and even Obama (and I think we're talking about actual hatred here, which is unfortunate) will cause people to vote for McCain anyway.  Already the justifications are beginning.  The one I'm hearing most often right now (which come to think of it, I heard when Bush first ran) was that we have to elect a Republican to get good judges.  First of all, I don't think McCain will appoint great judges based on his record.  His membership in the Gang of 14 calls this ability into question.  More importantly, the fact that he has his name associated with so many liberal laws fraught with Constitutional issues (like McCain-Feingold) means that I doubt he'd appoint someone who would oppose them.  I also find it interesting that a group of people who so strongly oppose judicial activism, and the increased roll of the judiciary over the legislature, would vote for someone solely because of the judges he may or may not appoint.

In the end, the reality here is that the Republican Party needs to be punished.  Clearly, they are incapable of putting forward a true conservative, and more troubling, I don't think they want to.  We cannot reward bad behavior by electing one.  Yes, that means that Hillary or Obama will be President.  But at some point in time, a line has to be drawn in the sand.  This far and no farther.  You may say now that we have to vote for McCain because we can't let Hillary become President (or Obama), but I guarantee you that I'll hear the same line 4 years from now when we're faced with the same choice between a douche bag and a turd.

That is why I continue to support Ron Paul, and I ask you to do the same.  He is the only one who has a clear Conservative record.  And if he loses the primary, and doesn't run as a Libertarian, then I'll be asking all of you to write in "None of the Above".  At some point we have to make a stand for small government, and a return to Constitutional principles.  If not now, when?  And if not Ron Paul, then who?

# Posted at 10:39 AM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 6 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Politics

Monday, February 04, 2008 7:34:03 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
There is hardly any difference between Hillary Clinton and George Bush, and likewise, there is hardly any difference between Hillary and McCain
Oh, come on. I suppose if you're looking at the micro-cellular level--it is the case that, you know, they're both human--you might have an argument. But there are deep and abiding differences, differences of style and substance and ethics and policy, between Clinton and both Bush and McCain. A Clinton presidency would be nothing like a McCain presidency. (For that matter, a McCain presidency [2001-2009] would have been nothing like the Bush presidency.)

Will Clinton move the country in the direction I want it to go as fast as I want it to go there? Goodness, no, and I'd dance naked around the maypole if I thought it would make someone like Feingold or Sanders electable (and I still weep for Wellstone). But on every issue I care about, and nearly every one I don't, Clinton and McCain stand in complete opposition to each other.

I couldn't stand listening to this kind of utter nonsense in 2000 with all the insufferable Naderites; are you telling me I'll be hearing it all year from Paulies?
Monday, February 04, 2008 11:11:50 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Jay - Russ will be making an intimate pizza-party appearance at a fundraiser for Rep. Andy Jorgenson in Fort Atkinson this Saturday at noon at Salamone's. I hear there are going to be lots of middle-aged babes there who want to have his baby.
Tuesday, February 05, 2008 12:26:19 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Here, here!

I was called "apathetic","self-absorbed", and "idealistic" when I left the Republican Party, just days ago. I took every intended stab as a compliment. Well, aside from "apathetic", which simply shows how out-of-touch the party has become, as I am anything but.

As Jason Lewis said today on his show, republican party die-hards are like an abused wife who continues to go back to the husband who beats,ignores, and mistreats her. To continue supporting them is to enable the abuse we suffer at their hands. I, for one, wasn't putting up with it anymore.

Nick, you're right-on. You keep me sane.

Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:34:20 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Jay... if you stop looking at the campaign rhetoric, and instead look at their voting histories, you will see that there isn't all that much difference between them. And if you're a libertarian, it's even easier to lump them all together. Sure, some of the issues they support are in fact different, but to a libertarian, it's like trying to compare an axe murderer to a guy pointing a shotgun at you. Sure, you'll die in a different horrific manner depending on the one you choose, but you're still dead, so is there really that much of a difference?

And Joey... I'm happy that I can help keep someone's sanity, even while I lose my own. :)
Tuesday, February 05, 2008 12:17:52 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
That's why I'm voting for Ron Paul.
Amy P.
Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:56:18 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
if you stop looking at the campaign rhetoric, and instead look at their voting histories, you will see that there isn't all that much difference between them.
See, that's not true either. It's possible that McCain voted not-your-way on a couple of issues of importance to you (as has Clinton for me), but 90% of the time or more McCain and Clinton vote the opposite of each other. I don't have the time to look at 7 years of roll calls, but just picking some shorthand measures--ACU ratings, National Journal ratings, liberal interest group ratings--it's easy to see that McCain and Clinton lie at opposite ends of the voting spectrum.

You could make the argument (as Nader did) that a "yea" is a vote for Coprorate Interest A and a "nay" is a vote for Coprorate Interest B and, therefore, there's really not daylight between them. But that's a pretty narrow-minded view of politics and governance and Nader was an ass for promoting it.

Fact is, McCain and Ron Paul have the exact same lifetime ACU score. Clinton's is about 75 points less. Tell me again which two candidates are most alike?
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2008 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar