The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, July 26, 2007
<< Wow Flickr Friday >>
What Is Scott Walker Afraid Of?

The Milwaukee County Board has passed a proposal for an advisory referrendum on a 1 cent increase on the sales tax:

The board voted 10-6 to ask voters their opinion on a penny sales tax boost, which would raise $120 million a year. Under the plan, half the money would be used for property tax relief; $22 million would pay for county parks; and $18 million would go for transit. In addition, the remaining $20 million would be sent to the 19 municipalities in the county to offset police and fire costs.
...
The vote marks the third time the board has agreed on a sales tax increase. County Executive Scott Walker vetoed both earlier attempts and is expected to veto this one as well.

Fraley has this statement from Scott Walker posted, which says in part:

My objection to the $120 million sales tax increase is based on two issues: jobs and truth.
Sending out the message that taxes will go up $120 million in the county will drive more jobs and more residents out of the county. This is a job killer.

I agree that this tax boost would not be good for Milwaukee and should fail.  He doesn't say expressly whether he will veto this referendum, but it sounds like he will.  This would be a shame.  I wrote about this the last time this came up, but I can't seem to find the post at the moment.  But I know my thoughts on this haven't changed.  Republicans love to push the idea of a Tax Payer's Bill of Rights, and yet whenever a voter referendum like this comes up in Milwaukee County, all the Republicans want it vetoed before it gets to the ballot.

One of the hallmarks of TABOR is that voters decide whether they want their taxes increased.  In order for that to occur, we actually need to be asked.  You never know Scott, we might shock you and actually say no.  I know that's how I would vote.  But I actually want the opportunity to be able to vote no.  Because frankly, I think a referendum on a tax increase failing carries a hell of a lot more weight than your simple one man veto.

I would much prefer that this were a binding referendum, so that a no vote would actually mean no... but an advisory referendum that flips the finger at the County Board will do quite nicely as well.  And what if the voters of Milwaukee County vote yes to the tax increase?  Well... then we can't blame legislators for bad policy... we can only blame ourselves because we voted for it directly.

Referendums should only be feared if you are afraid of the voters Scott.  So what are you afraid of?

# Posted at 9:28 PM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 6 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Politics

Friday, July 27, 2007 7:15:50 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Stupidity on the part of the electorate would be my guess. After all, schools have conned the populace into hundreds of millions in tax increases, including $93 million up in New Richmond (hardly a large or prosperous community).
Friday, July 27, 2007 8:12:58 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
This does come down to the basic question of who is in charge of who doesn't it? Is the electorate in charge of the government, or the other way around? Unlike most tax increases, this is a referendum to be voted on directly by the people. By continually vetoing it, it shows that he believes we are not in charge.
Friday, July 27, 2007 12:39:47 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
I am glad Walker is determined to be a road block to tax increases.

First, the referendum is non binding, and not cheap to conduct.

Second, it would also take a change in state law.

Walker said on WISN this morning that he thought a referendum would fail but that he would have no part in advancing the prospects of a 120 million dollar tax increase.

Why don't we have referendums on everything and just get rid of the county boards, county executives, legislature and governor then if it's the ultimate way to empower the electorate? Because in our democratic republic, we elect leaders to lead and then the electorate holds them accountable.

Scott Walker was elected to hold the line on spending and taxes. His stonewalling on this issue is welcome, indeed.
Friday, July 27, 2007 12:42:12 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
Fraley... I assume you're also against TABOR then?
Friday, July 27, 2007 12:58:51 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
The ONLY way Walker should allow this referendum to go through is if it was on the April ballot when all of the supervisors are up for election! Otherwise, I helped elect him so that we would NOT see ANY increases in taxes. He is doing what he was elected to do and what he said he would do.
Calvin
Friday, July 27, 2007 10:34:58 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
For the past twenty years, I've heard the right-wingers talk about the "intellectual elite" (like being smart is a bad thing) and how they sit in Washington or Madison or the courthouse or city hall, and try to tell people how to live their lives, like the people couldn't figure out what is best for them. Now we have the same right-wingers telling us that the electorate is stupid and gullible. Would this make the right-wingers the "plutocratic elite"? That the people don't have rights, only those rich enough to afford them should have rights? That the right-wingers knows what's best for the people, and we should listen to them because they know more than us? Let it be voted on, up or down.

And Fraley, Walker was elected to be county executive, not county executioner, and definitely not to be the perpetual gubernatorial candidate.
capper
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2012 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar