The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, January 04, 2007
<< Damn You Beyonce! Nothing Is Certain But Death and Taxes >>
Step One: Admit Your Addiction

I didn't comment on this right away, but I figured I'd have to eventually once other people did, and I saw their quite typical reactions.  Obama used to do cocaine.  More importantly, he came right out and admitted it, in an 11 year old memoir.  Reactions from both sides are not at all surprising.  Many people are comparing this to Bush and Clinton.  Clinton smoked pot, but claimed he "never inhaled"... yeah right.  Bush simply stonewalled and hid the truth... which more than likely was that he drank like a fish, and there are also rumors he did cocaine as well.

You'd think politicians would be smarter than that.  Not about the doing drugs part, but about hiding their past, and expecting it not to bite them.  Both Bush and Clinton took hits because of it.  Don't they know that the scandal of hiding something is always worse than thing you're trying to hide in the first place?  Did nobody learn the lessons of Watergate?  How many times as a parent did each of them tell their children that it's better to be honest about something right away, because lying about it will only cause more problems later?  Maybe they never told their kids that... I thought that was a standard parental lecture.  I guess it's do as I say, not as I do.

I think that the reactions that people have to Obama's drug use are especially relevant to the War on Drugs.  People use drugs.  Fact.  What do we do about them?  The typical drug warrior first wants to throw them in jail, and then stigmatize that person for life, and making meaningful recovery that much harder.  Yeah, cause that will win the drug war.

But here have a former addict, who successfully quit, has turned his life around in a meaningful way, and has become very successful in life.  This is hard for a drug warrior to accept.  We have to stigmatize!  We have to make this person out as the sign of everything wrong with society!  But why?!  He is honest about his past, and proud of what he has done since then, as he should be.  I would submit that if Bush and Clinton had done the exact same thing, they would have fared better regarding drugs. 

Jessica McBride disagrees.  More over, she says:

Actually, a better message for young people would be not to try "a little blow" in the first place. Funny, but a lot of underprivileged high schoolers make it to adulthood without using pot, booze, or "blow."

And while she's right, but a lot of high schoolers do try it.  And what message should we send them?  You did it once, and so you will always be a bad person who can't be successful in life?  It shows just how detached from reality people like Jessica are.  People do drugs because drugs feel good... really good.  When people describe using cocaine as having a "whole body orgasm", is it really that surprising that people would do it?  Hello.  My personal opinion, which comes from watching the effects of cocaine on people I love, is that the price you eventually pay for that pleasure is too high.  That's why I've never touched it myself.  But to pretend like that pleasure can't be a draw is just absolutely stupid.

The problem with Bush and Clinton wasn't their drug use... it was lying about drug use.  In essence, it shows that you really aren't fully recovered from your addiction, because you can't admit to it.  That is step one, in any 12 step program.  Obama has shown he is fully recovered from his addiction, and I think serves as an excellent role model for former drug users.  I can say that even though I disagree with his particular brand of politics.  I think everyone should be able to say that.

# Posted at 10:48 AM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 17 Comments  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Politics

Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:26:32 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I know you'll jump on me about this, but while I think "rehabilitation" is good I can't repress my gut reaction that anyone who does recreational drugs is a complete idiot.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:32:41 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
To be honest Elliot, I'm not sure where to go with that. By saying that anyone who uses drugs is an idiot, prefaced by putting rehabilitation in quotation marks, it leads me to believe that you think that drug users are incapable of truly recovering, or learning from their drug using experience. Is that true?

My whole point to the post is... no matter what you think about drug use, how do we treat people who have used drugs after they've come clean? If we honestly believe that drug use is bad for society, what is the best way to encourage people to stay clean? You didn't answer any of those questions.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:43:02 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I do think people can make productive contributions after being involved with drugs. In fact, I currently employ someone who would describe himself as a recovered drug user.

However, as Red on That 70's Show would say, I think anyone who does drugs in the first place is a dumbass.

Was that clearer? ;)
Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:46:36 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Sure... that's more clear. But then again, my mom thinks I'm a complete idiot for doing the Polar Bear on Monday. So what's your point?
Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:41:38 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
The point is your mother is a very wise woman. ;)
Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:43:35 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
It's a good thing she doesn't read my blog. The last thing I need is for people to be filling her head with silly ideas, like her being wise.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:10:35 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"By saying that anyone who uses drugs is an idiot, prefaced by putting rehabilitation in quotation marks, it leads me to believe that you think that drug users are incapable of truly recovering, or learning from their drug using experience. Is that true?"

I'm sure you know that redicivism rates are incredibly high for drug and/or alochol abuse.

In general, and I'm not saying universally, but in general, I don't believe that addictions exist. I think it's all about addictive behavior. I really don't believe that any biological urge to smoke a joint or snort a line is stronger than my will power not to, if I don't want to. So I'm not sold that, IN GENERAL, addictions are real, per say. It's the behavior.

And it is pretty damn hard to get someone to change an inherent attitude or behavior.

P.S. Please activate HTML tags in your comment box ;)
Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:19:28 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hold on one second Jenna. You acknowledge that recidivism rates for drug/alcohol abuse are high... but then say addiction doesn't exist? As I briefly stated before, I know from first hand experience that physical addiction exists. I've witnessed it.

I've also witnessed people overcome addiction. It's HARD. Is there a willpower aspect to it? Absolutely. But what is also important to realize here, is that the way we're executing the War on Drugs makes recidivism more likely, not less.

Remember... drugs have a powerful draw, and most people use them to "escape a problem". However, the way that we treat simple addicts today is make life so difficult for them because of their escape, that the only thing left for them is to turn back to that escape. So whether you believe in physical addiction or not, we don't help people change their behavior... we encourage them to keep it.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:21:33 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
P.S. HTML comments, along with trackbacks, and a few other goodies will be coming soon, as soon as I upgrade to the new version of Das Blog which will allow me to control spam much better, which was starting to become a problem.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:18:01 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"Hold on one second Jenna. You acknowledge that recidivism rates for drug/alcohol abuse are high... but then say addiction doesn't exist? As I briefly stated before, I know from first hand experience that physical addiction exists. I've witnessed it."

I'm not convinced that substance addictions exist. I do think that many people are prone to and suffer from addictive behavior; thus the high recidivism rates for drug/alcohol abuse.

From the addicts that I've known and/or met, I've seen more of an addictive behavior, or a dependent-type behavior. I believe that individual substance addictions are a result of this and mental, not physical or biological.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:23:27 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'm not saying that psychological dependence doesn't exist because that is certainly a factor, but many drugs, especially after prolonged use, do change brain chemistry, which is a primary cause of physical addiction. Beyond that, I don't know what else there is to say to convince you... so we'd just have to agree to disagree on that point.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:39:31 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"anyone who does recreational drugs is a complete idiot."

Here is a list of people that Elliot thinks are complete idiots:

Carl Sagan
Bill Gates
Pythagorous
Sir Richard Branson
Steve Jobs
Henry Luce
Aldous Huxley
Jules Verne
Hemingway
Sigmond Freud
Francis Crick
Richard Feynman
Kary Mullis
Ken Kesey
Houston Smith
Bill Clinton
Abraham Lincoln
George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
JFK
Winston Churchill
Stephen King
Shakespear
Herman Hesse
Alexander Dumas
Louis Carroll
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Bob Dylan
Douglas Adams
Edgar Allen Poe

Here is a list of people that JIJAWM thinks are complete idiots:

elliot


I think it's important to draw a distinction between "using" drugs and "abusing" drugs. Even you, Nick, called Obama "a former addict, who successfully quit." Where did you get that he was an adict? Or that he "quit"? I heard he just did a little blow. And stopped when he didn't want to do it anymore.

I agree with your point though Nick. We need to quit lying to kids. We shouldn't tell them we never did drugs (if we did), or that Marajuana will ruin their lives or that people that use drugs are inherently bad people. I'm wary of people that say they never did any drugs, or at least drank alot. It says they're either liers or boring.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:46:15 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
JIJAWM... you're right in that I may have overstated the degree of his use or abuse... however you want to characterize it. For his sake though, I do hope he quit... because if he didn't, then I don't think he should be President, on that reason alone.

But we have been lying to our kids a lot about exactly what drugs do, and exactly how bad they are. Most of the propaganda in the drug war has very little basis in fact, and is overblown in an effort to keep kids from trying it in the first place. That of course feeds into the need of so many who view drugs as a sin, to punish someone for a choice which is inherently personal.
Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:10:24 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'm not sure admitting drug use is critical for every situation. Public office - you might as well because you need to ward off the media's titillating indulgence in exposing skeletons (you want to talk about an addiction...). In real life, I'm not of the opinion it's important to admit it or share it aloud. Some things are better left unsaid or undiscussed. Besides, you can't really move on unless you yes, admit it, but at some point you need to stop talking about it if that's not who you are anymore.

On addiction: I agree with Jenna that addiction is a behavior. It leads to physical addiction but our brains are some pretty amazing creations that we can route and reroute the chemistry.

Here is an excellent article about addiction by Ted Dalrymple. Read on to see how Chairman Mao felt about drug addicts. I'm not advocating that approach, but some things work a lot better than coddling.

http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_wsj-poppycock.htm
Friday, January 05, 2007 10:20:29 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I think that admitting an addiction, even for a non-public person is important to a degree. Not because its important for other people, but because your willingness to admit it says something about where you are mentally.

But you're right Phel... you eventually do have to move on. You can tell the people who still have a problem with drugs or alcohol when they can tell you the exact day they quit, or when they say "I've been sober for 2 years, 3 months and 4 days." The person who says, "I don't know, maybe 2 years"... they're moving on with life. At a certain point in time, it should just become another detail of your past, like how many siblings you have. That doesn't mean you never talk about it, just that it shouldn't be the center of every conversation you have.
Friday, January 05, 2007 11:52:35 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'd like to point out that almost all the people JIJAWM mentioned are dead.

See what drugs will do to you?

(On a more serious note, being accomplished in one part of your life doesn't mean you can't behave foolishly in another aspect of your life. Many great men/women have cheated on their spouses. That doesn't make cheating less reprehensible or less harmful. And before you bend over backwards trying to make drug use seem harmless lets talk about a few of the geniuses we lost before their time because of drug use:

John Belushi
Lenny Bruce
Jimi Hendrix
Billie Holiday
Janis Joplin
Keith Moon
Elvis Presley
Sid Viscious )
Friday, January 05, 2007 12:32:40 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Right - you absolutely have to admit having a problem - I often think that "accepting you have a problem" is more like it. It's private and the audience to which you "admit" is more important.

Hell, I have accepted many different things I have a problem with. It goes without saying... it all depends upon the level of self-awareness.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2009 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar