The World According to Nick
Politics, News, Photography, and Triathlons... What don't I talk about?
Thursday, January 04, 2007
<< Not That We Have to Worry About This... You And Me Bob >>
And Who's Going to Clean Up Next Time?

Unbelievable.  The Washington Post has this story today:

NEW ORLEANS -- By ones and twos, homeowners here are reinhabiting neighborhoods, even the most devastated ones, and many view their return as a triumph over adversity.
...
After Katrina, teams of planners recommended that broad swaths of vulnerable neighborhoods be abandoned. Yet all areas of the city have at least some residents beginning to rebuild. With billions of dollars in federal relief for homeowners trickling in, more people are expected to follow.

Moreover, while new federal guidelines call for raising houses to reduce the damage of future floods, most returning homeowners do not have to comply or are finding ways around the costly requirement, according to city officials.
...
New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin (D) so far has favored allowing evacuees to inhabit their old neighborhoods as they wish.

Mike Centineo, the city's building chief, said, "Legally and morally, we're doing the right thing," but he acknowledged that most returning homeowners are not raising their houses to meet the new flood guidelines.

Fine.  You want to rebuild in such a way that you will get wiped out again, then you do it without federal aid.  I don't want a dime of my money going to you.  And if that money is going to get used so you can rebuild your home where it shouldn't be built, in a way that it shouldn't be built, so it can get destroyed yet again, then don't come crying to me for help next time.  This is your chance to do it right.  Either take advantage of it, or you're on your own next time.  And the next time you'll deserve everything you get.

This is exactly why this sort of mass federal aid for rebuilding New Orleans (in George Bush's words) exactly as it was, is a mistake.  More importantly, this is why federal flood "insurance", which insulates people who live in dangerous areas from the potential expense of living in those areas, is also a disaster.

# Posted at 2:10 PM by Nick  |  Comment Feed Link 1 Comment  |  No Trackbacks

 Add to del.icio.us |  Digg this Post | Filed Under: Current Events

Friday, January 05, 2007 11:41:49 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'm surprised to hear this from Wauwatosa. Are you a fairly recent transplant? If not, I'm sure you remember the 1997 and 1998 Menominee River floods - not the first of its floods by any stretch, just especially noteworthy for their levels of damage. It's taken the Menominee watershed areas quite a few reminders to learn any lessons at all, and it hasn't seemed to induce the city of Wauwatosa to pick up and move to Nevada.

The fact is, all settlements on waterways are vulnerable, and all those settlements are valuable too - they're necessary risks for human commerce, and intrinsic to robust national and global economies. Wauwatosa wouldn't have been founded if it weren't for the Menominee connecting Wisconsin farm produce to Milwaukee's port on Lake Michigan; New Orleans wouldn't have been founded if it weren't at the mouth of one of the world's largest river systems with a basin encompassing a third of the United States.

I don't know how much commercial traffic the Menominee gets these days, but the South Louisiana port complex has the highest volume by tonnage in the world. If you object to the federal aid to New Orleans (which was flooded by the negligence of a federal agency, as self-professed by the Army Corps of Engineers), by all means tell your elected representatives that you don't want any more oil, gas, coffee, rubber, shampoo or polyester (OK, no one wants polyester), and that you'd like to curtail Wisconsin's farming for export to the point that the industry can't survive.

I'm a Wisconsin native, raised on Madison's marsh-fill, residing in New Orleans 15 years now. I happened to be in the vicinity for Stoughton's tornadoes in August 2005, and got back to New Orleans just in time to evacuate for Katrina. I don't begrudge Stoughton's rebuilding efforts - the losses, though smaller than Gulf Coast's, were terrible, and it deserved more assistance than it got. We're all vulnerable, everywhere, and we're all interdependent.

Acting put-out about the use of "your money" (especially when some of ours helped fund your flood control not so long ago) for the extremely meager recompense of the tens of thousands who lost everything to an UNnatural disaster is disappointing to hear from my native state, which is at its best, I believe, when its stubborn fair-mindedness prevails over the hot-heads of either end of the political spectrum.
Comments are closed.


© Copyright 2012 Nick Schweitzer
Powered By newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
Theme Based on Design By maystar