Follow the article link to a picture of today's front page of the New York Times. The right column headline is "G.O.P Opposes Abortion and Gay Unions". Now then, this is front page, above the fold... usually reserved for new and breaking type news headlines. I hate to break it to you New York Times, but the G.O.P has always been against abortion and gay unions. This is nothing new. The fact that they once again put it in the party platform is also nothing new. Is this honestly a shock for the editors at the Times... or was this just another excuse to bring up something people have pretty much always known? I'm kind of curious.

If that's what it takes to write at the Times, then hell, even I could do that.